Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. Tenneco Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1988No. CA 8528Published

1DissentWilliams, Judge

The panel majority holds that Jones was not obligated to arbitrate the termination of his LTD benefits because Tenneco’s obligation to pay the benefits survived Jones’ discharge and that obligation was not, of itself, subject to the arbitration agreement. I disagree. Not only was Tenneco’s right to discharge Jones subject to the “Arbitration and Grievance Procedure” of the parties’ labor contract, but Tenneco’s obligation to pay Jones’ LTD benefits was also subject to the arbitration agreement.

Jones’ right to the LTD benefits is based upon an oral agreement supplementing a written labor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dalton v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 60Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  2. Martin v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  3. Nyland v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local No. 1960Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API