Legal Opinion

Bushey v. Raths

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. Debt. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

On the 28th day of February, 1877, Peter Baths commenced an action by attachment in justice’s court against Joseph Bushey; property was attached und.er the writ, but no personal service, and on the 9th day of April, 1877, judgment was rendered therein against the defendant. April 14th, 1877, defendant filed with the justice an affidavit for a special appeal and bond, and a return thereto was made on the 17th. September 17th, 1878, the appeal was by the circuit court dismissed because the entry fee had not béen paid ; and on the next day an execution was issued by the justice upon the judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watson v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kidd v. DoughertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Fleugel v. LardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Vanderhoof v. PrendergastMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API