Legal Opinion

Vanderhoof v. Prendergast

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1892Published

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Eeplevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff brought replevin for 90,000 feet of saw-logs. Defendant justified under a writ of attachment issued against the goods and chattels of one E. M. Vanderhoof, brother of plaintiff, and offered evidence to show that the property originally belonged to the defendant in attachment, and was transferred to the plaintiff in fraud of creditors. The defendant offered in evidence the writ of attachment, affidavit, and proceedings before a justice of the peace. It subsequently appeared that the attachment case proceeded to judgment before the justice, but that the judgment so obtained was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Treat v. DunhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bushey v. RathsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API