Legal Opinion

Fontenot v. Sunland Construction

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1986No. 84-973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Judge.

The issues presented in this appeal are (1) whether or not the trial court erred in finding that plaintiff was totally and permanently disabled under the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Statute, and (2) whether or not the trial court erred in failing to find that the defendants were liable for penalties and attorney’s fees.

This is a workmen’s compensation action brought by Bruce Fontenot (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) against his employer, Sunland Construction Company (hereinafter referred to as Sunland), and its workmen’s compensation insurer, Organ & Company, Ltd.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. Olson v. Ins. Co. of State of Pa.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Bassemier v. WS Young Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clifton v. RAPIDES REGIONAL MED. CENTERLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Fontenot v. Sunland Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API