Legal Opinion
Coney v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 20, 1978No. 77-273PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George Howard, Jr., Justice.
The question for review is whether the trial court’s finding that appellant had breached the implied warranty of proper design and installation of a septic tank system, in a new house sold to appellee, is supported by substantial evidence.
THE FACTS
On July 11, 1973, appellee purchased a new house from appellant, a residential building contractor in the Little Rock area. The house, which is located at Mabelvale, Arkansas, was sold as a package deal, including all plumbing and a septic tank system, for a total purchase price of $24,349.00.
Appellee encountered his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
3Cited by11 opinions
- Caceci v. Di Canio Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Carroll-Boone Water District v. M. & P. Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Wingfield v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Loch Hill Construction Co. v. FrickeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Hesson v. Walmsley Const. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.