Legal Opinion

Boasen v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1896No. 8236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for Kearney county. Tried below before Beall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, 0.

Certain judgments were entered against Kearney'county in the district court of that county. The judgment creditors applied to the district court for a writ of mandamus to require the clerk and the chairman of the board of supervisors to issue warrants in payment of the judgments, it being alleged that there, were funds available sufficient for their payment. A peremptory writ was allowed. Thereafter the plaintiff in ~rror succeeded to the office of chairman of the board of supervisors and the writ was served upon him. He refused to comply therewith, and the present proceeding was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Van Houten v. County JudgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seth Thomas Clock Co. v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Gaddis v. BryanNebraska Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API