Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Gaddis v. Bryan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1918No. 20367Published

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: William M. Morning, Judge.

1DissentSedgwick, J.

The majority opinion, in the syllabus, declares the law to be that the city council will be held to have exercised “a judicial discretion” whenever the law ‘‘contemplated the presentation of proof,” “a consideration thereof, and a decision thereon.” This radical change *508in onr law is of so much importance that it ought not to be announced without referring to our former decisions and furnishing the reasons for the change. Mandamus will not lie to control the “judicial discretion” of an administrative officer, or any other officer. The question in such cases generally is whether the officer has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Transportation v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Valley R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Custer County Agricultural Society & Live Stock Exchange v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel Nelson v. Lincoln Medical CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Haberlan v. LoveNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Boasen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API