Legal Opinion
United States v. Rahman
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided January 20, 2006No. 2:05-mj-00063Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVER, District Judge.
On October 24, 2005, defendant Nabeel Ahmad Rahman moved to dismiss Count 54 of the indictment on various grounds, including that it failed to allege an essential element of the crime as it was defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1960 during a portion of the time period charged in the count. Defendant Sammer Ahmad Abdel Rahman 1 filed a motion to dismiss Count 54 on November 18, 2005. On December 9, 2005, the government filed a response to a number of pre-trial motions, including the motions to dismiss Count 54.
Because Count 54 of the indictment fails to allege all of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Samuel Loring Morison, the Washington Post Cbs, Inc., Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Galo Velastegui, Also Known as Galo R. Velastegui, and Gmj Travel & Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. James Daniels, United States of America v. James DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. TalebnejadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.