Legal Opinion

Bates v. Mullins

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1937No. 43779PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKintzinger, J.

The plaintiff, as receiver of the Redfield Savings Bank of Redfield, Iowa, commenced this action against the defendant, George Mullins, and codefendant, William H. Morrison, to quiet title to a large tract of land in Dallas County, Iowa. In his answer and counterclaim, the defendant Mullins claims to be the owner of said land, and asks that the title therein be quieted in him. The intervenor Morrison alleges that he has purchased the land in question under a contract from defendant Mullins, and asks that his rights be protected.

There is no dispute about the facts in this ease. Prom the record…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moody v. FunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  2. Witham v. BloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Cooper v. MaurerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Tirrill v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Bevans v. DeweySupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. RenshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API