Legal Opinion
State v. Ferrara
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 21, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
92 N.J. Super. 549 (1966)
224 A.2d 159
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DANIEL FERRARA, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court, Law Division Criminal.
Decided October 21, 1966.
Mr. Joel Sondak, Assistant Prosecutor, argued for plaintiff (Brendan T. Byrne, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).
Mr. Harvey Weissbard, argued for defendant (Messrs. Querques and Isles, attorneys).
SCHAPIRA, J.C.C.
The court is presented with an issue of novel impression in New Jersey and one of importance in facilitating the administration of criminal procedure. The question posed is whether a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Nueslein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SwiderskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. FerraraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967