Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 24, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

795 A.2d 297 (2002)

350 N.J. Super. 335

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Edward C. BISHOP, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted March 27, 2002.

Decided April 24, 2002.

Peter A. Garcia, Acting Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Edgar F. Devine, Jr., Waldwick, Designated Counsel, of counsel and on the brief).

John Kaye, Freehold, Prosecutor Monmouth County, attorney for respondent (Barbara Suppa, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Appellant filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Before Judges BAIME, NEWMAN and FALL.

The opinion of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. State v. PrecioseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. G.M. v. C.V.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  3. State v. ThompsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. State v. BrenesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. People v. BanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API