Legal Opinion
National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 27, 2003No. 02-30477, 02-3148PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
This case is one in a long line of disputes between on one side the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) and on the other side the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), and/or in a separate but related dispute the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”), concerning the PUC’s assignment of costs and responsibilities for maintaining and repairing rail-highway crossings in Pennsylvania. The PUC appeals 1 from the District Court’s order which: (1) denied the motions of the PUC and PUC Commissioner Aaron…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ITT Corp. v. Intelnet International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Itt Corporation v. Intelnet International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Glen Thomas, Chairman, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Robert K. Bloom, Vice Chairman, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Aaron Wilson, Jr., Commissioner, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Terrence J. Fitzpatrick, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003