Legal Opinion

Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Mularcik

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 18, 1961No. File 16572PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.

Plaintiffs, Gerald H. Davis, as life tenant, and the Connecticut Bank and Trust Company, as owner of the remainder interest, of and to an attractive residential property in the lovely old town of Woodbury, seek to enjoin the defendants, as owners of a sand and gravel bank on adjoining property, from carrying out their announced plan of operating, in connection with the existing commercial use of their property, a rock crusher and stone screener. Although the locality is admitted by defendants to be “heavily residen tial,” there are several commercial establishments in the immediate vicinity…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Jack v. TorrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. DeLahunta v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Danbury & Norwalk Railroad v. Town of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  5. Taylor v. CookeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. North Montgomery Materials, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API