Legal Opinion
Antonishin v. Keisler
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 20, 2007No. 06 CV 2518, 06-2518.071-RSKPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN F. GRADY, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Alternatively, defendants ask us to remand the named plaintiffs’ applications to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b). For the reasons explained below, we grant defendants’ motion in part and deny it in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are lawful permanent residents of the United States who have applied to be naturalized as United States citizens. (Compl. ¶3.) As part of the application…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hamandi v. ChertoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Sawan v. ChertoffDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Ali v. FrazierDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Albarran v. WongDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Miao He v. ChertoffDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.