Legal Opinion

Balice v. Weiand

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 21, 1963No. Gen. No. 48,854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Louis Balice filed a complaint under the provisions of the Dram Shop Act against William J. Weiand and Daniel D. McCarthy, for damages because of injuries suffered in a tavern at 1010 North Clark Street, Chicago. McCarthy owned the real estate and Weiand, the lessee, owned and operated the tavern. The defendants appeal from a judgment on a verdict for $15,000.

Plaintiff, who lived in the vicinity of the tavern, testified that he came into the tavern at about 1:15 a. m. on April 11, 1959. The building housing the tavern is on the west side of Clark Street. The bar runs east and west along the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. SeitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Fels v. ArendsIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. AraizaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Galyean v. DuncanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Lesnak v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Roberts v. CaseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API