Legal Opinion

In re Estate of MacKay

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 5, 1981No. 80-501PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether the Probate Court (Spanos, J.) erred in finding that the plaintiff “was not actually named or distinctly referred to personally” (emphasis in original) in the will of her father, and therefore was entitled “to the same portion of his estate, real and personal, as she would be if the deceased was intestate.” We agree with the decree and affirm.

James C. MacKay, the testator, whose will is the subject of this appeal, married Zatae Slack in 1918. On June 12, 1920, they had a child, Virginia Louise MacKay, now Virginia L. Greer, the plaintiff. In 1924 the couple…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Royce v. Estate of DenbySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. In the Matter of JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Gage v. GageSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1854
  4. Boucher v. LizotteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Estate of LauraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. In re Estate of TreloarSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. In re Estate of CameSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. In re Estate of RobbinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  5. In re Estate of Marie G. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API