Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Guinn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2016No. 2015-2013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Daniel Joseph Guinn of New Philadelphia, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0084686, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2009. In March 2015, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged him with professional misconduct for neglecting two client matters, misrepresenting the status of a case to a client, filing a frivolous lawsuit, and failing to properly inform clients that he lacked professional liability insurance. Guinn stipulated to the charges, and after a hearing, the Board of Professional Conduct issued a report recommending that we sanction him with a two-year…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. PfundsteinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. HilburnOhio Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sullivan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KarpOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'DiamOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Brueggeman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API