Legal Opinion

WildEarth Guardians v. Montana Snowmobile Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2015No. 12-35434PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

WildEarth Guardians, Montanans for Quiet Recreation, Inc., and Friends of the Bitterroot, Inc. (collectively,' “Wild-Earth”), challenge the United States Forest Service’s decision to designate over two million acres of public land in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest (“Forest”) for use by winter motorized vehicles, principally snowmobiles. Wild-Earth alleges that the Forest Service’s review of the environmental impacts of snowmobiles under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”)1 was inadequate in several material respects. Wild-Earth also alleges that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Wildearth Guardians v. Heather ProvencioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Native Ecosystems Council v. Leanne MartenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Wild Wilderness v. John AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Audubon Society of Portland v. Deb HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API