Curtis v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The defendant was indicted and tried for robbery. The record proper, shows due arraignment, personal appearance of defendant, attended by counsel, the setting of a day for trial, and proper order for special venire. No error appears upon the record proper.
The defendant was convicted of robbery, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for' a period of twenty-five years, and sentence was duly passed on Mm in accordance with the verdict of the jury. A motion for new trial was duly made hy defendant, and overruled by the court, and -to which ruling an exception was duly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Jackson Lumber Co. v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Veid v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Dees v. Lindsey Mill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Insurance v. RaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gholston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Gilchrist v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937