Legal Opinion

Mangano v. Town of Wilmington

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 13, 2001No. 98-P-1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCypher, J.

In his complaint for declaratory relief, James W. Mangano sought a declaration that the town of Wilmington (town) wrongfully withdrew certain real property from the bidding process and therefore the town should be ordered to accept his bid. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment and a Superior Court judge ruled in favor of the town and dismissed Mangano’s complaint. We conclude that Mangano cannot force the town to accept his bid.

Facts. The essential facts are undisputed. A vote was taken at a Wilmington town meeting to transfer a parcel of land on Rollins Road to the board of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Phipps Products Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Edge Moor Bridge Works v. County of BristolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Curtis v. AspinwallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Datatrol Inc. v. State Purchasing AgentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Professional Services Group, Inc. v. Town of RocklandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. St. Paul Companies v. TIG Premier InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Ten Taxpayer Group v. City of Fall River Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API