Legal Opinion

St. Paul Companies v. TIG Premier Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 30, 2003No. 01-P-532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHugh, J.

The St. Paul Companies (St. Paul), the plaintiff here, is a workers’ compensation insurer who paid the claim of an injured employee and then discovered information suggesting that, from the outset, the claim had been the responsibility of the defendant, TIG Premier Insurance Company (TIG), another workers’ compensation insurer. St. Paul brought an action in Superior Court against TIG to recover the amounts St. Paul had paid. On cross motions for summary judgment, a *651judge dismissed the complaint because of St. Paul’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. St. Paul appeals, and we affirm.

Th…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Telesetsky v. WightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Assuncao's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. J. & J. ENTERPRISES, INC. v. MartignettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Baccanti v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. Maslab Liquidation Trust v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Bolduc's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API