Legal Opinion
In Re Carla Freeman, Carla Freeman v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General Michael Chertoff William McNamee Joe Meisenheimer, Real Parties in Interest
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2007No. 06-75539Published
1Opinion of the Court
489 F.3d 966
In re Carla FREEMAN,
Carla Freeman, Petitioner,
v.
United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Respondent,
Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General; Michael Chertoff; William McNamee; Joe Meisenheimer, Real Parties in Interest.
No. 06-75539.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed May 29, 2007.
Brent W. Renison, Parrilli Renison, LLC, Lake Oswego, OR, for Petitioner.
Kenneth C. Bauman, USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney Mark O. Hatfield, Portland, OR, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Francis W. Fraser, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richard L. Barron Linda M. Barron v. Robert Reich Department of Labor Robert KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Carla Freeman v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Bazua-Cota v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hansen & Rowland, Inc. v. C. F. Lytle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Freeman v. United States District Court for the District of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007