Legal Opinion

Freeman v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 2007No. 06-75539PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In Freeman v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.2006), we decided that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) erred in two respects in refusing to adjudicate Carla Freeman’s application for adjustment of status. First, we decided that DHS was incorrect that entry into the United States through the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) precluded Freeman from availing herself of the procedural protections afforded to other applicants for adjustment of status. Second, we held that an alien whose citizen spouse dies before DHS adjudicates' a properly filed immediate relative petition and application…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richard L. Barron Linda M. Barron v. Robert Reich Department of Labor Robert KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Carla Freeman v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Bazua-Cota v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Hansen & Rowland, Inc. v. C. F. Lytle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Carla Freeman, Carla Freeman v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General Michael Chertoff William McNamee Joe Meisenheimer, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API