Legal Opinion · Dissent

Remus v. Board of Education for Tonawanda City School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000Published

1Dissent

Green, J. P., and Hayes, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. On June 4, 1998, respondent followed the recommendation of its Superintendent and passed a resolution appointing petitioner on tenure (see, Education Law § 2509 [2]). Although petitioner’s tenure was not effective until September 2, 1998, the appointment on tenure was binding on the date of the resolution (see, Matter of Weinbrown v Board of Educ., 28 NY2d 474, 477; see also, Matter of Marcus v Board of Educ., 64 AD2d 475, 477), and respondent was without power unilaterally to *907rescind the appointment (see, Matter of Cummings v…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moritz v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Weinbrown v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 15New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Walcott v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Marcus v. Board of Education of Cohoes City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Walcott v. FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API