Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant seeks reinstatement to his former post in the Internal Revenue Service. We have considered the contentions advanced by appellant, but are satisfied he received all the procedural rights accorded him by statute and regulation. We find no error “cognizable within the scope of permissible review,” Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 88, 243 F.2d 29, 32, certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 970, 77 S.Ct. 1060, 1 L.Ed. 2d 1137 (1957). The order of the District Court, granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment, will accordingly be
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Newell M. Hargett v. Arthur E. SummerfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
3Cited by29 opinions
- Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Mitchell Van Bourg v. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Cortright v. ResorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.