Legal Opinion

Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 8, 1961No. 16213PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant seeks reinstatement to his former post in the Internal Revenue Service. We have considered the contentions advanced by appellant, but are satisfied he received all the procedural rights accorded him by statute and regulation. We find no error “cognizable within the scope of permissible review,” Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 88, 243 F.2d 29, 32, certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 970, 77 S.Ct. 1060, 1 L.Ed. 2d 1137 (1957). The order of the District Court, granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment, will accordingly be

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newell M. Hargett v. Arthur E. SummerfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Mitchell Van Bourg v. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Cortright v. ResorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
  5. Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API