Legal Opinion

Shelly v. Heater

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for Richardson county* Tried below before Broady, J.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This is an action of replevin for a stock of goods. The petition is in the usual form alleging the ownership of the goods. The action was originally brought against the sheriff, who held.them under an order of attachment. Upon motion of the sheriff, the attachment plaintiff was substituted as defendant, and is defendant in error in this court. The substituted defendant (Heater) filed his answer, the allegations of which are in substance that the sheriff who had possession of the property held by virtue of an order of attachment issued in an action wherein Heater was plaintiff and Donald…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chance v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Rothell v. GrimesNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API