Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pardeeville Electric Light Co. v. Sachtjen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The only issue is whether the trial judge now sitting in Branch No. 2 of the circuit court for Dane county can refuse to hear further testimony, and proceed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and enter judgment based upon evidence, a portion of which was taken before the public service commission or its examiner and a portion taken before the Hon. August C. Hoppmann, then acting circuit judge, now deceased.

Petitioner contends: (,1) That it is the duty of the present sitting judge to at this time hear any testimony which the petitioner desires to offer in the action now pending…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Lanphere v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State Ex Rel. Joyce v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Starke v. Village of PewaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Cortez v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Cortez v. BD. OF F. & P. COMM.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Cram v. BachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Cram v. BachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API