Atencio v. Quality Care, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge METZGER.
Linda E. Atencio, claimant, seeks review of that portion of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which held, as a matter of law, that housekeeping and attendant services prescribed by her physician were not recoverable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. We set aside that portion of the Panel’s order and remand the cause to the Panel.
The facts are not in dispute. While working as a nurse’s aide for respondent, Quality Care, Inc., claimant, who is left-handed, reached out with her left arm to catch a patient who was falling. She injured her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grover v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Sigman Meat Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- City & County of Denver, School District 1 v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Industrial Commission v. Pacific Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
3Cited by10 opinions
- Suetrack USA v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- ABC Disposal Services v. FortierColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. DowneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hillen v. Tool KingColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bouge v. SDI Corp., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.