State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Scheetz
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentRawlings, Justice
During trial of this case, Detective Leland Meikle was permitted to testify regarding certain inculpatory statements made to him by defendant in the course of a pretrial interrogation. Defendant interposed timely objections to the effect he was restrained of his liberty at time of questioning, and not given some of the constitutionally required prefatory Miranda warnings.
The majority finds no error in permitting introduction of this challenged testimony.
I submit the majority, in so finding, ignores certain well established applicable principles heretofore clearly enunciated by the United…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.