Legal Opinion

Tigerton Lumber Co. v. Village of Tigerton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 5, 1929:

Stevens, J.

Plaintiff’s cause of action is dependent upon its right to now offset against its additional taxes the amount of personal property tax paid in each of the years for which an additional income tax was assessed.

Sec. 71.21 of the Statutes of 1923, which was the only legislative, enactment that permitted the offsetting of personal property taxes against income taxes, had been repealed before these additional income taxes were assessed. Plaintiff’s contention is that it was entitled to the same personal *379property offset in 1926 that it would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yano v. Stott Briquet Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State ex rel. Schuster Realty Co. v. LyonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hooper v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Otto Eisenlohr & Bros. v. DickinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State ex rel. S. Heymann Co. v. LyonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waldheim & Co. v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Aberg v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API