Legal Opinion

Williams v. Board of Commissioners

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1903No. 1,602PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Broadwater County; F. K. Armstrong, Judge. E. A. Caeleton presented a claim to tbe board of county commissioners of Broadwater county. From tbe action óf tbe board in allowing part of tbe claim, David T. Williams and other taxpayers appealed to the district court, which rendered judgment against appellants; from which judgment, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, they appeal. Reversed.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Broadwater County; F. K. Armstrong, Judge. E. A. Caeleton presented a claim to tbe board of county commissioners of Broadwater county. From tbe action óf tbe board in allowing part of tbe claim, David T. Williams and other taxpayers appealed to the district court, which rendered judgment against appellants; from which judgment, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, they appeal. Reversed. The board of county commissioners must cause to be kept in suitable books a record of all their official acts. (Sec. 4219, Political Cbde.) To prove these official…

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER CALLAWAY

prepared tbe opinion for tbe court.

It appears from tbe record that tbe board of-county commissioners of Broadwater county, at a special meeting held in *364January, 1899, employed George Lambert and another to index tbe records of their county, and ordered the county clerk to give Lambert and associate access to his office and to the records therein. This the county clerk, upon the advice of the county attorney, refused to do. After the adjournment of the board Dumen, its chairman, met Lambert upon the street, and directed him to employ counsel for the purpose of bringing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paola & Fall River Railway Co. v. Comm'rs of Anderson CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. State ex rel. Lambert v. CoadMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lebcher v. Board of CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Nunan v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kirkup v. Anaconda Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. School District No. 4 v. McGrawMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Urton v. American Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Day v. School District No. 21Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Raish v. Orchard Canal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API