Uridias v. Morrell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court, Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
This action is based upon the thirteenth section of the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act, as amended by the third section of the Act of 1862. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff demised the premises to the defendant for one year ensuing the first of October, 1860, at the yearly rent of two dollars per acre ,• that on or about the first of October, 1860, the defendant entered into possession of the premises under the lease, and that after the expiration of the term the defendant failed and refused to deliver the possession of the premises to the plaintiff, or to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Klink v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by7 opinions
- Butler v. KaulbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Buhne v. CorbettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Gartlan v. C. A. Hooper & Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Turnbaugh v. HusseltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Wyoming Construction & Development Co. v. Buffalo Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.