Borten v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL, J.
In Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 816 [30 Cal.Rptr.3d 441], we held that the Santa Monica Rent Control Law requires landlords to subsidize rent for those who reside principally in their rent controlled units, but not the rent of those who use their rental units for other purposes. We upheld the Santa Monica Rent Control Board’s regulation. 3304, which permits a landlord to petition the board for a determination that a tenant is not using a rental unit as his *1487primary residence, which determination (if favorable to the landlord) entitles him to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Borten v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006