Legal Opinion
In Re Martel
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 21, 2008No. 2007-100PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The respondent, Robert Martel, appeals from a final decree of divorce issued by the Portsmouth Family Division (Sadler, J.). The petitioner, Susan Martel, cross-appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part and remand.
I. Background
The record supports the following. The parties married in November 1985 and had one child in July 1988. The petitioner filed for divorce in April 2005 alleging the fault grounds of adultery, RSA 458:7, II (2004), and treatment so serious as “to injure health or endanger reason,” RSA 458:7, V (2004). The respondent filed a cross-petition for divorce,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- In Re HampersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Arcidi v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Kittredge v. KittredgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- In Re CarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Finan v. FinanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Richard Holt & a. v. Gary Keer & a. Gary Keer & a. v. Richard Holt & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- 38 Endicott Street North, LLC v. State Fire MarshalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- In re MallettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State v. FournierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.