Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sumner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1986No. Docket Nos. 74523, 75109, 75168, (Calendar Nos. 3-5)Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRiley, J.

I agree with the majority’s adoption of the continuing violation doctrine. However, I disagree with the majority’s application of the doctrine in Sumner. Thus, I dissent.

The majority finds as persuasive United Air Lines, Inc v Evans, 431 US 553; 97 S Ct 1885; 52 L *555Ed 2d 571 (1977). Under Evans, essential to the establishment of an actionable continuing violation is a present violation within the limitation period. The present violation must be a discriminatory act sufficiently connected to the prior acts by more than a "vague or undefined relationship.” Ante, p 539. Without the showing of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Glasgow v. North Carolina Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1981
  3. Goucher v. JamiesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Gungrich v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API