In Re A.G.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this case we are asked to determine the extent of double-jeopardy protections in juvenile-delinquency proceedings. We reaffirm that juveniles are entitled to the same constitutional double-jeopardy protections as adults, and we hold that juvenile courts must conduct the same double-jeopardy analysis in delinquency proceedings that other courts apply in adult criminal proceedings.
I. Case Background
{¶ 2} In June 2012, a person approached a man as the man was opening his car door after obtaining money from an ATM inside a store. The person pulled a gun out of his pocket and told the man…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Grandview Hts. v. B.S.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. LadsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. RosserOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.