Gleason v. Pittsburgh Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
This is an action in trespass by George Gleason, as natural guardian of William Ross Gleason, a minor, and by George Gleason and Kathryn N. Gleason, as parents in their own right, to recover for personal injuries sus tained by the boy when he fell from a sliding board erected by The Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh in connection with one of its housing units known as the Arlington Heights Housing Project.
At the time of the injuries, plaintiffs occupied an apartment in defendant’s Arlington Heights Project. To the rear of the building in which they…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McHugh Et Ux. v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Schmidt v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Zlates v. NasimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Gustafson v. Kennywood Park Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schilz v. Walter Kassuba, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Cooper v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Jack Kravetz, a Minor by Saul Kravetz, Parent and Natural Guardian, and Saul Kravetz, in His Own Right v. B. Perini & Sons, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Contranchis v. Parish of JeffersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Summers v. Grant Park Baptist ChurchOregon Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.