Legal Opinion

Diamond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 30, 1970No. 69-438PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OWEN, Judge.

Appellant filed a motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 1.850 CrPr, 33 F.S.A. on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. This appeal is from the order denying such motion.

The newly discovered evidence was a written statement given to the police by one Gruosso, the driver of the car in which appellant was a passenger at the time the police stopped the car and placed both Gruosso and appellant under arrest on the charge of possession of marijuana. After they were arrested, both Gruosso and appellant were taken to the police station, but appellant was released shortly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Belk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. McNeal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tafero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Henzel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Roth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API