Legal Opinion · Concurrence

J.L.M. v. S.A.K.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 19, 2008No. 2070641Published

1ConcurrenceThomas, Judge

I concur in the result of the main opinion because of the language used by our legislature in Ala.Code 1975, § 30-2-55. That statute requires the termination of periodic alimony upon petition and proof that a former spouse has either remarried or is living openly or cohabiting with a member of the opposite sex. Although the courts have construed the intention behind the enactment of § 30-2-55 to be to require termination of alimony in those situations in which a former spouse’s postmar-ital relationship rises above “the occasional brief sojourn” but might not be considered to amount to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. O'Dell v. O'DellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Parish v. ParishCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Paulk v. PaulkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API