Legal Opinion
Cottonport Bank v. Reason
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 2001No. 01-1039PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J^DOUCET, Chief Judge.
The Defendants, Alfred and Rose Reason, appeal the judgment of the trial court finding them liable for payment under consumer guaranty agreements and ordering them to pay $5,000.00 each to the Plaintiff, The Cottonport Bank (the Bank).
In March 1990, the Reasons each signed a “Consumer Guaranty” agreement in the amount of $5,000.00, for the benefit of their son, Brent Reason.
*1237In April 2000, the Bank filed this suit to collect on the continuing guaranties, alleging that it was entitled to collect on the guaranties because of Brent Reasons failure to pay as required by a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guar. Bank & Trust Co. v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Pat S. Todd Oil Co., Inc. v. WallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- First Financial Bank, FSB v. AustinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- WHITNEY NAT. BANK v. BadalamentiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Merchants Tr. & Sav. Bank v. DON'S INTERN., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cottonport Bank v. DD Group, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- The Cottonport Bank v. Dd Group, Inc. D/B/A Central FordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006