Legal Opinion
Davis v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 1, 1987No. CX-87-868PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants Davis & Son Contracting (Davis), Two Inlets Mill and Building Supply (Two Inlets), EOS Corporation (EOS), Watkins Construction Company, Inc. (Watkins), and Wayne Lee Excavating, Inc. (Wayne Lee) brought an action against *756Richard Johnson (Johnson), John Speakman (Speakman), and James Vander Griend (Vander Griend), seeking compensatory and punitive damages for amounts due them for labor and materials supplied in remodeling the ski resort Val Chatel, Inc. (Val Chatel).
Appellants claim the Val Chatel corporation was a sham, an alter ego, and a bare instrumentality…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Saint Paul Building LLC v. Commonwealth Properties Incorporated, John Rupp, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024