Legal Opinion

Woodard v. City of Des Moines

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1917PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Lawrence DeGraff, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Plaintiff’s theory of the case is that South Park, lying immediately west of South Ninth Street, at its intersection with Gray' Street in the city of Des Moines, is a public park, owned and cared for by the city and opened, to public use; that the park lies considerably below the level of Ninth Street, and is reached by the public from that side by a platform and a flight of steps leading down from said street and within the park area; and that they have, in fact, been in use by the public for many years, more especially as a means of access to a line of street railway, which *1104crosses the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. Incorporated Town of CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Lane v. SteinigerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Fisher v. EllstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Byerly v. City of AnamosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Rose v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patusco v. Prince MacAroni, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Fetters Ex Rel. Fetters v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Fuller v. BuhrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Bachelder v. WoodsideSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Beach v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API