Legal Opinion
Hood Canal Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Brady
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 1, 2015No. Case No. C14-5620 BHSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Michael Brady, Ray Mabus, the Department of Navy, and the United States of America’s ‘ (“Federal Defendants”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 38). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to the motion and the remainder of the file and hereby grants the motion for the reasons stated herein. ’ " ’
I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On July 7, 2014, the United States Navy acquired an easement from the State of Washington. Dkt. 34 (“Comp.”) ¶…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bonta, LLC v. City of MarysvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Brimstone Natural Resources v. HaightDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Brimstone Natural Resources v. HaightDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Gypsum Resources LLC v. Clark CountyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Hunters Capital LLC v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.