Legal Opinion

BankEast v. Michalenoick

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 25, 1994No. 93-157PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant, Charles Michalenoick Jr., appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Morrill, J.) granting plaintiff BankEast’s renewed motion for summary judgment in its action to recover on a loan guarantee. The defendant makes a variety of arguments, only one of which we need address here: that the trial court erred as a matter of law in determining that foreclosure proceeds did not constitute a paydown of principal on the loan secured so as to relieve the defendant from liability under the guarantee. We reverse.

This case previously came before this court on an appeal from an earlier…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. R. Zoppo Co. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Horse Pond Fish & Game Club, Inc. v. CormierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. University Savings Ass'n v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Mast Road Grain & Building Materials Co. v. Ray Piet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Manchester Bank v. Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Appeal of DellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Tenet Healthsystem TGH, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Appeal of Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Lewis v. Shawmut Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Connecticut General Life Insurance v. PuniaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API