Legal Opinion

L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. A.S. (In re J.P.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 17, 2017No. B277756PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUBIN, ACTING P. J.

*617When a dependency court declares children dependent and removes them from a parent's custody, is it within the court's discretion to order a reunification plan with which the parent indisputably *618cannot comply due to a language barrier? We find the answer rather self-evident and conclude that such a plan, doomed to fail, is an *750abuse of discretion. We therefore reverse the dispositional order that imposed it.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Family History

In 2013, father A.S. (father) immigrated to the United States, from Myanmar, with two of his four children. His wife,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re Kafia M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. G. G.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Roland C.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. M.J.California Court of Appeal · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hamza B. v. Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2026
  2. In re Ashley A. CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. In re H.T. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. In re J.E. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. In re Jeanine R. CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API