Southern Surety Co. v. Tessum
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion
6. Plaintiff's petition for a rehearing suggests that appellants Dahlen, Prichard and Loken may be cosureties with it because of the sale bond which they executed as sureties with Oluf Tessum as principal. Each guardian filed a sale bond. That of Miller Tessum (exhibit B) recites that "we Miller Tessum as principal, and B. H. Cummings and James O'Hara as sureties, are held and firmly bound," etc. The bond of Oluf Tessum (exhibit G) provides that "we, O. Tessum as principal, and Henry S. Dahlen, W. W. Prichard, Sr., and Halvor Loken as sureties, are held and firmly bound," etc. Each bond is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. HornsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State ex rel. Supervisors of Otto v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Van Norman v. BarbeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Bjoin v. AnglimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- School District No. 80 v. LappingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.