Ritchie v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
Because I believe the jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt that any mitigating circumstances that exist are outweighed by the aggravating circumstance or circumstances I respectfully dissent from Part VI of the majority opinion.
The majority cites Bivins for the proposition that "[t]he determination of the weight to be accorded the aggravating and mitigating circumstances is not a `fact' which must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt but is a balancing process." Slip op. at 8 (quoting Bivins, 642 N.E.2d at 946). Whatever validity this proposition may have had previously, it can no longer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Price v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.