Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ritchie v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2004No. 49S00-0011-DP-638Published

1Dissent

Because I believe the jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt that any mitigating circumstances that exist are outweighed by the aggravating circumstance or circumstances I respectfully dissent from Part VI of the majority opinion.

The majority cites Bivins for the proposition that "[t]he determination of the weight to be accorded the aggravating and mitigating circumstances is not a `fact' which must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt but is a balancing process." Slip op. at 8 (quoting Bivins, 642 N.E.2d at 946). Whatever validity this proposition may have had previously, it can no longer…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Price v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API