Legal Opinion

Briscoe v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2013No. 11-CV-981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Senior Judge:

Appellant Gwendolyn Briscoe sued the District of Columbia for negligence, seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly resulting from the District’s failure to repair a small defect in the curbstone in front of her home. The trial court granted the District’s motion for summary judgment, and appellant noted this appeal. Before this court she contends that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment because there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the District had constructive notice of the alleged defect. The District argues in response, first,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. District of Columbia v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Clampitt v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Robert Klein and Ruth Klein v. District of Columbia, United States of America and Roxton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stephen M. Sullivan v. AboveNet Communications, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Akbar v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  3. Akbar v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. Charles v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  5. Frankeny v. District Hospital Partners, LPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API