Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Neville

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided February 27, 2004No. 92 CV 3102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEALON, J.,

Defendants’ petitions to stay or set aside the plaintiff’s execution proceeding raise a troubling issue in malpractice litigation involving an insolvent insurer: Whether a health care provider may be personally liable for the amount of a malpractice judgment which is not paid by the Insurance Guaranty Association, the statutory excess coverage fund or an insurer or other collateral source? Pennsylvania common law has long held that a tort-feasor is personally liable for any judgment that is not paid by the applicable insurance. No provision in the statutes governing the Guaranty…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. BraddyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API