Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ashford v. Heisey

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00660Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALFRED ASHFORD, JR., : Plaintiff : No. 1:25-cv-00660 : v. : (Judge Kane) : MICHAEL HEISEY, et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Presently before the Court are an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and complaint filed by pro se Plaintiff Alfred Ashford, Jr. (“Ashford”). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant Ashford leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the complaint without providing him with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Ashford, a convicted and sentenced state prisoner,1 commenced…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API